linux - RPM ignore conflicts -

-

i have bunch of rpm files in folder. trying install them using: rpm -ivh *.rpm rpm can take care of correct installation order.

on of these rpms have newer version installed in system example:

package info-5.0-1 (which newer info-4.13a-2) installed

/opt/freeware/man/man1/infokey.1 install of info-4.13a-2 conflicts file package info-5.0-1

is there way ignore old .rpm file , resolve dependency new version installed? thought of --force option. how --force resolves conflicts? overwrites them older version or ignores them leaving new version?

any thoughts welcome.

the --force option reinstall installed packages , overwrite installed files other packages. don't want normally.

if tell rpm install rpms directory, this. rpm can not ignore rpms listed installation. must manually remove unneeded rpms list (or directory).

you can remove old rpm , rpm resolve dependency newer version of installed rpm. work, if none of installed rpms depends on old version.

if need different versions of same rpm, rpm must relocatable. can tell rpm install specific rpm different directory. if files not conflicting, can install different versions rpm -i (zypper in can not install different versions of same rpm). packaging example ruby gems relocatable rpms @ work. can have different versions of same gem installed.

i don't know on files rpms conflicting, if of them "just" man pages, can overwrite new ones old ones rpm -i --replacefiles. problem be, confuse reading old man page , thinks actual version. problem rpm --verify command. complain new package if old 1 has overwritten files.

is possibly duplicate of https://serverfault.com/questions/522525/rpm-ignore-conflicts?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

javascript - Count length of each class -

-
i have below code in this fiddle . html <span class="myname">john smith</span> <span class="myname">john smith</span> <span class="myname">john smith</span> <span class="myname">john smith</span> <span class="myname">john smith</span> <span class="myname">john smith</span> javascript $('.myname').each(function(){ var text = $(this).html().split(' '), len = text.length, test = $(this).val().length, result = []; console.log('outside: ' + test); for( var = 0; < len; i++ ) { result[i] = '<span class="name-'+[i]+'" >' + text[i] + '</span>'; console.log('inside: ' + test); } $(this).html(result.join(' ')); console.log('after
Read more

What design pattern is this code in Javascript? -

-
this question has answer here: why write “.call(this)” @ end of javascript anonymous function? [duplicate] 4 answers what kind of design pattern , significance of using closure? (function(){ // code here }).call(this); edit then difference between above code , following this keyword still refer same object in both ways. (function(){ // code here })(); thats invoked function expression. more info here: http://benalman.com/news/2010/11/immediately-invoked-function-expression/ the purpose run code while protecting scope (so variables declared within don't leak out global scope. update call sets value of this function being applied on. without it, value set window object, there set outer scope.
Read more

hadoop - Restrict secondarynamenode to be installed and run on any other node in the cluster -

-
i have have cloudera cdh3u4 cluster setup. have secondarynamenode daemon running on 1 of nodes. i have ensure user has root access node on cluster (for example, datanode not have other daemons running) should not able start instance of secondarynamenode daemon on node (thereby having 2 secondarynamenodes on cluster) how can achieve this? thanks in advance. add property hdfs-site.xml namedfs.secondary.http.address valuesecondarynamenode-host address or ip:50090
Read more